Re: Proposed change to capability URNs

[Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>]

Rob Enns wrote:

> Based on the XML directorate comments that the # naming scheme for
> capabilities
> is problematic, I'm proposing that we change NETCONF capability URNs to
> the 
> following format:
>
> urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:capability:{name}:1.0
>
> For example:
>
> urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:capability:startup:1.0
>
> (the old style was urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0#startup)
>
> Does this sound reasonable?
>  

It seems okay to me.
Unless anyone strongly objects to this proposal on the mailing list,
we should just add it into the next prot update.

> thanks,
> Rob
>  

Andy

> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
>
>
>  


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>