RE: Proposed Update to Netconf Charter

["Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
> I would prefer "A concrete data model" over "An XML schema" 
> to reduce the number of different terms for the same thing 
> down to one. If we have concensus to use XML schema, then I 
> am also fine with using XML schema terminology everywhere. I 
> just dislike the mixture of terminology here. I rank this 
> medium high - I do believe that we need to write concrete 
> examples to see whether our guidelines work, but I am not 
> sure netconf itself has something of reasonable complexity to 
> configure.
>  


I believe that I understand what you are saying here, but let me ask you
the question - do you believe that we have something better than XML
schemas to express the first instances of data model that we want to
create? I would rather go ahead and define some workable example that
would also serve as proof of concept for the framework rather than
engage in a long discussion about what language data models need to be
expressed. 

Dan


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>