[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Netconf over SSH

Margaret Wasserman wrote:


Hi Tom,

From a quick look at the referenced draft, it does look like we should register the "netconf" service name. Thanks for catching this! I don't think that this will present a problem, since secsh-assignednumbers is in the RFC editor queue, along with all of the core SSH drafts.

Andy and Simon, should I just do an update for this? Or do you think we should run this by the WG first? 

Just update the draft -- we don't need to review an
omission in the IANA Considerations section.


Margaret 


Andy


At 4:43 PM +0200 6/1/05, Tom Petch wrote:

I think the subsystem name 'netconf' needs registering with IANA. I find the
ssh document not clear over this, but on balance I think subsystem names do need
registering.

I would take this to need a normative reference to

 [SSH-NUMBERS]
              Lonvick, C., "SSH Protocol Assigned Numbers",
              I-D draft-ietf-secsh-assignednumbers-12.txt, March 2005.


Tom Petch


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>




--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>




--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>