[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: no NETCONF WG meeting planned for Paris

To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Subject: Re: no NETCONF WG meeting planned for Paris
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 20:08:11 +0200
Cc: dbharrington@comcast.net, Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortel.com>, netconf <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F088D8FF9@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Mail-followup-to: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, dbharrington@comcast.net, Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortel.com>, netconf <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
References: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F088D8FF9@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Reply-to: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 06:55:21PM +0300, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:

> In Minneapolis the Netconf WG decided to continue the NETMOD work within
> Netconf rather than creating a new WG.  

Can a WG decide something during an IETF meeting?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

References:
- RE: no NETCONF WG meeting planned for Paris
  - From: "Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>

Prev by Date: RE: no NETCONF WG meeting planned for Paris
Next by Date: Re: no NETCONF WG meeting planned for Paris
Previous by thread: RE: no NETCONF WG meeting planned for Paris
Next by thread: RE: no NETCONF WG meeting planned for Paris
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread