Re: few comments on the prot-06 draft -- positiveInteger/seconds

[Bob Natale <Bob.Natale@AppliedSNMP.com>]

Hi,

Since overall WG feedback was sought:

I share Juergen's position on both questions -- positiveInteger and 
seconds.

Cheers,
BobN

---- Original message ----
>Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 07:32:09 +0200
>From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>  
>Subject: Re: few comments on the prot-06 draft  
>To: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
>Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "Steven Berl (sberl)" 
<sberl@cisco.com>, netconf <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
>
>On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:10:54AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>> I do not think there is consensus to make any change at this time.
>> 
>> I wonder what the rest of the WG thinks?
>
>I think positiveInteger is what we should use and I like the idea
>to allow for a resolution in seconds.
>
>/js
>
>-- 
>Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
><http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 
Bremen, Germany
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>