Re: Proposed Resolution to PROT I-D Issues List

[Hector Trevino <htrevino@cisco.com>]

Randy Presuhn wrote:
> Hi -
>
> > From: "Hector Trevino" <htrevino@cisco.com>
> > To: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
> > Cc: "Andy Bierman" <ietf@andybierman.com>; <sberl@cisco.com>; "'Wes Hardaker'" <wjhns1@hardakers.net>; "'Andy Bierman'"
> >   
> <abierman@cisco.com>; <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 9:55 AM
> > Subject: Re: Proposed Resolution to PROT I-D Issues List
> >   
> ...
> >  I agree that with he current definitions this is the case but seems to
> > me they could be tighten up so that they enforce validity of the message
> > (syntactically).
> > Or is there something else I'm missing here?
> >   
> ...
>
> The point is that there is more to a protocol than syntax.
> There are constraints on the validity of a message that
> cannot be enforced by syntactic means alone.
Right. All I was asking for is to tighthen up the definitions to enforce
syntax - at least that's what I tried to say -. 
> Randy
>
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

-- 
Hector Trevino
Network Management Technology Group (NMTG)
Cisco Systems Inc.        Voice:  720-875-1369
Suite 400                      
9155 E. Nichols Ave     Fax:    720-875-3014
Englewood, CO             E-mail: htrevino@cisco.com
80112