[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NetConf over SOAP normative reference issue



Ted Goddard wrote:


One of the original concerns about SOAP 1.2 was the lack of available implementations and the lack of compliance exhibited by SOAP 1.2 implementations.

I don't remember this being discussed by the WG


It seems that SOAP 1.2 is now implemented widely enough to insist on it. Are there any comments on the current implementation status of SOAP 1.2 vs SOAP 1.1? (Is this even open to discussion, given the standards status of SOAP 1.2 vs SOAP 1.1?)

It's an issue that needs to be addressed. Here are the differences between SOAP 1.1 and 1.2:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part0-20030624/#L4697


Are there any differences that impact NETCONF?

It doesn't seem like we can remove reference [16] (RFC 3288)
without removing all of section 2.6. Is there an update
planned for SOAP over BEEP?



Thanks, Ted.

Andy


On 16-Mar-05, at 9:42 AM, McDonald, Ira wrote:

Hi,

I'm agnostic about the use or non-use of BEEP in NetConf.

But, yes I am urging you to change to SOAP/1.2 and NOT use
the SOAP/1.1 mapping over BEEP defined in RFC 3288.

RFC 3288 slipped through the side door somehow and got published
without the IESG objecting to the RFC 3288 normative dependency
on the non-standards-track SOAP/1.1 W3C Note.

The IESG (or at least Bert Wijnen) is now aware of this same
normative dependency (SOAP/1.1) in the NetConf over SOAP I-D.

I submit this issue as a last call comment.

Could someone please update the "Goals and Milestones" on the
IETF main page for NetConf WG, so that outsiders could tell
what's going on?

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Blue Roof Music / High North Inc PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 phone: +1-906-494-2434 email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org]On
Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:26 PM
To: netconf@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: NetConf over SOAP normative reference issue


Hi -

From: "Andy Bierman" <ietf@andybierman.com>
To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Cc: <netconf@psg.com>; <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: NetConf over SOAP normative reference issue

...

Are you suggesting we re-cast the document in terms of SOAP 1.2,
and drop the BEEP dependency?


what do you mean "drop the BEEP dependency"?


Ira's note said there was a normative reference to RFC 3288.

Randy

From: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
To: <netconf@psg.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:53 AM
Subject: NetConf over SOAP normative reference issue

Hi,

[Bert Wijnen asked me to pass on this comment.]

The latest NetConf over SOAP <draft-ietf-netconf-soap-04.txt>
has a serious problem for advancement on the IETF "standards
track", to whit, these two normative references:

[3] Box, D., Ehnebuske, D., Kakivaya, G., Layman, A., Mendelsohn,
N., Nielsen, H., Thatte, S. and D. Winer, "Simple Object Access
Protocol (SOAP) 1.1", W3C Note NOTE-SOAP-20000508, May 2000,
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508>.


[16] O'Tuathail, E. and M. Rose, "Using the Simple Object Access
Protocol (SOAP) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)",
RFC 3288, June 2002, <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3288.txt>.

...



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>




--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>




--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>