[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: last call comments on the mapping documents
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 08:51:57PM -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> You seem to think that we should remove everything about how NETCONF
> could be run in an interactive command-line environment (such as a
> standard SSH login or telnet session), but that information has been
> in the document since the beginning (literally years ago at this
> point), and I think that you have been the only person to make that
> suggestion.
Here is what I wrote:
: 2) I think sections 2, 3, and 4 stress too much the interactive start
: of the ssh subsystem. I would prefer that the text really just
: explains how NETCONF runs over ssh. In other words, I suggest to
: show the capability exchange currently shown in section 2 in
: section 3 where it is discussed. All the material specific to
: typical ssh clients should IMHO go into section 5.
: If people prefer to keep the command line to start an ssh
: conversation in the document, then it should at least be changed
: to accomodate the netconf specific port since I understand that
: NETCONF over ssh uses a new well-known port to be assigned by
: IANA.
I guess the beginning of the second paragraph is confusing. I just
want a separation of the definition or running netconf over ssh from
the specifics how to invoke a netconf subsystem from an interactive
shell. The proposal is simply to move all text that talks about
command line client specifics from section 2 and 3 to section 5.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>