[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: STDCONF WG charter proposal

To: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: STDCONF WG charter proposal
From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:49:39 -0400
Cc: xmlconf@ops.ietf.org, ops-nm@ops.ietf.org, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Bert Wijnen <bwijnen@lucent.com>
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020917160848.03e27040@fedex.cisco.com>

Hi Andy,

In general, I think that your proposal is excellent.  I have some
general questions/thoughts, though...

Do you plan to hold a BOF for this effort in Atlanta?  Or are you
hoping to move directly to a WG?

How could we avoid dead-lock on the overall approach for configuration?

Are you expecting this to be a requirements-driven effort, or a
solutions-driven effort?  Maybe some of both?

Margaret




--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: STDCONF WG charter proposal
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

References:
- STDCONF WG charter proposal
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: How does XML help Network Operators
Next by Date: Re: STDCONF WG charter proposal
Previous by thread: STDCONF WG charter proposal
Next by thread: Re: STDCONF WG charter proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread