Re: Deja vu Again

[Randy Presuhn <rpresuhn@dorothy.bmc.com>]

Hi -

> Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020626171514.04980a08@fedex.cisco.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:18:35 -0700
> To: Randy Presuhn <rpresuhn@dorothy.bmc.com>
> From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: Deja vu Again
> Cc: xmlconf@ops.ietf.org
> In-Reply-To: <200206270008.RAA05515@dorothy.bmc.com>
...
> We should support real requirements.  Every vendor is going to need
> their own namespace(s) and schemas, just like we have now with 
> enterprise MIBs.
...

Gack.  At least with CIM/XML, whether it's a standard object
definition, an extension, or something purely proprietary,
it's still the same XML schema.  For every gizmo under the
sun to have its own XML schema would be leaping in the wrong
direction.

 ------------------------------------------------------
 Randy Presuhn          BMC Software, Inc.  1-3141
 randy_presuhn@bmc.com  2141 North First Street
 Tel: +1 408 546-1006   San José, California 95131  USA
 ------------------------------------------------------
 My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
 ------------------------------------------------------

--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>