RE: Incomplete XML Draft

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> I'd wait for the BOF to finish before talking about what the WG
> will do.

there is some precedent for this approach <smile>

> If the purpose of the WG is to provide a standard way to move
> proprietary configuration around, then it doesn't seem that
> interesting.

to whom?  i suspect that operators might find it of interest,
as it is a step for which they have been asking.

> As it starts taking on more goals, it starts to look like a
> replacement for SNMP or COPS-PR.

could SMTP be next?  :-)

btw, there is a mailing list for this bof, xmlconf@ops.ietf.org.

randy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>