[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: STD 62 IPv6 updates ?

To: Eduardo Cardona <e.cardona@CableLabs.com>
Subject: Re: STD 62 IPv6 updates ?
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:03:29 +0200
Cc: ietfmibs@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <5259D0D7419C6149B347837A2E64F46F01BA2FC0@srvxchg.cablelabs.com>
Mail-followup-to: Eduardo Cardona <e.cardona@CableLabs.com>, ietfmibs@ops.ietf.org
References: <5259D0D7419C6149B347837A2E64F46F01BA2FC0@srvxchg.cablelabs.com>
Reply-to: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.10i

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:14:48AM -0600, Eduardo Cardona wrote:
> All, I assume that support for IPv6 in SNMP is a matter of requiring
> support of transportDomainUdpIpv6 from RFC 3419 as one of the mandatory
> TDomains. 
> Is that correct? 
> 
> I am wondering if there is else were a statement or document that
> precisely set this as a conditional MUST if IPv6 is supported. 
> 
> RFC 3417 explicitly says "Systems implementing IPv4 MUST implement the
> mapping onto UDP over IPv4."

I do not think there is such a statement in any of our documents -
SNMP over UDP/IPv6 is not really specified. Someone should write up
this short document...

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

References:
- STD 62 IPv6 updates ?
  - From: "Eduardo Cardona" <e.cardona@CableLabs.com>

Prev by Date: STD 62 IPv6 updates ?
Next by Date: Re: RFC 4001 TC Question
Previous by thread: STD 62 IPv6 updates ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread