[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Degraded minutes in 3895bis
HI,
About a month ago Orly Nicklass proposed making some additions to the
DS1-MIB in RFC 3895 and issuing a revised RFC 3895bis. In a recent
thread on the newsgroup comp.dcom.sdh-sonet it was stated that degraded
minutes counters are no longer relevant, according to current performance
ANSI/ITU monitoring standards. If that is true, then it might be
appropriate to deprecate the degraded minutes counter(s) and write new
compliance statements for 3895bis.
Regards,
Mike Heard
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sdh-sonet
Subject: Re: On Performance monitoring of E1/DS1 de-multiplexed from SDH/SONET
Gary wrote:
> [Huub wrote:]
> >[Gary wrote:]
> > > I am going to support RFC2495 (DS1/E1 MIB) in the product with
> > > STM-1/OC-3 interface that terminates STM-1/OC-3 down to DS0.
Note that RFC 2495 has been superseded by RFC 3895. From
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc-index.txt we have:
3895 Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1, E1, DS2, and E2
Interface Types. O. Nicklass, Ed.. September 2004. (Format:
TXT=163841 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC2495) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
This version adds a few objects and corrects some errors that were in
the previous version.
> > > 4) Degraded minutes of RFC. Is it right that this parameter no longer
> > > relevant?
> >
> > Indeed, degrading is now calculated using 15 minute and 24 hour
> > error counters.
>
>[Gary] OK, thanks
I didn't know that. I will forward this information to the appropriate
IETF discussion list. There has been some discussion of issuing an
update to RFC 3895; if that happens, then the degraded minutes counter(s)
should be deprecated and new compliance statements should be written.
//cmh