RE: [AVT] Comments on draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-xr-mib-02

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> Aha... great. 
> Thanks Juergen for reminding me we should not just force
> exact boiler plate where it is more of a CLR-type thing than
> a real problem.  By now I have had some more sleep. And it is
> also now weekend... so maybe that is why I am less nit-picky
> today ;-)
> 
> I think then what we may want to do is to update the mib-boiler-plate
> page to suggest either of those 2 forms and explain why the current
> form is there (history), that both forms are correct, and that
> maybe we should recommend to use the more clearer form.
> 
> I will prepare the new mib-boiler-plate text after which I will
> allow for critique.
> 
> If anyone have any further comments/opinions now, pls do send

Just one question, will it be necessary now to change the MIB review
guidelines document, which says:

3.1.  MIB Boilerplate Section

   This section MUST contain a verbatim copy of the latest approved
   Internet-Standard Management Framework boilerplate, which is
   available on-line at http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-boilerplate.html.

There is still time for minor tuning, as it is still in the RFC Editor
queue and has not yet reached AUTH48 ...

Mike