Re: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny

[Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>]

At 04:20 PM 1/27/2003 -0800, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>Hi -
>
>> From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
>> To: <mibs@ops.ietf.org>
>> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:57 PM
>> Subject: FW: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny
>>
>
>> Just in case any of you has a comment or concern
>...
>>   FlowIdOrAny       TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
>>       DISPLAY-HINT "d"
>>       STATUS        current
>>       DESCRIPTION  "The flow identifier or flow lable in an IPv6
>>                     header that may be used to discriminate traffic
>>                     flows.  The value of -1 is used to indicate a
>>                     wildcard, i.e. any value.
>>                    "
>>       SYNTAX        Integer32 (-1 | 0..1048575)
>...
>
>Does it worry anyone else that objects defined using this TC would
>not be usable in INDEX clauses?

No.  If there are any MIBs planned or in progress that want to
create a table that would need to model a 'wildcard flow' then
I would change my mind.  Is 1048576 a safe choice?

I'm more concerned about:
  - label misspelled in the DESCRIPTION clause
  - range in the SYNTAX clause should be -1..1048575
  - missing REFERENCE clause


>Randy

Andy