[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: Updating the MIB boilerplate

To: bwijnen@lucent.com
Subject: Re: FW: Updating the MIB boilerplate
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:06:48 +0100
Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <A451D5E6F15FD211BABC0008C7FAD7BC0F457B92@nl0006exch003u.nl.lucent.com>(bwijnen@lucent.com)
References: <A451D5E6F15FD211BABC0008C7FAD7BC0F457B92@nl0006exch003u.nl.lucent.com>

>>>>> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) writes:

Bert> OK, I have seen a number of supportive statements for the text
Bert> (new MIB Boiler plate) below.  I have not heard any objections
Bert> yet. If there are any, please speak up ASAP. 

Just a nit:

Is the section title "The SNMP Management Framework" still the correct
name or are we now calling the section the "Internet-Standard
Management Framework" as the first sentence and reference RFC2570bis
seem to imply? From a stylisitic point, it is not really good to use
an acronym in a section header before it is actually introduced.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder    <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>

References:
- FW: Updating the MIB boilerplate
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: Updating the MIB security guidelines
Next by Date: Re: Updating the MIB boilerplate
Previous by thread: Updating the MIB security guidelines
Next by thread: RE: FW: Updating the MIB boilerplate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread