Re: Updating the MIB boilerplate

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>]

>>>>> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) writes:

Bert> I have also looked at this, and it seems that one line sentence
Bert> to point to Section 7 of rfc2570bis would do the job (or so I
Bert> think). As far as I am concerned, that can even be an
Bert> informative reference.

Bert> I would think that in many cases we will continue to need
Bert> normative references to RFC2578/2579/2580 cause people almost
Bert> always import stuff from those 3 documents.

So why did we classify all the SNMP references with the existing
boilerplate as normative? What is the logic of removing normative
references when you revise a document and replace the boilerplate?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder    <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>