[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: [ipv6mib] So, where were we?
- To: Brian Haberman <bkhabs@nc.rr.com>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: [ipv6mib] So, where were we?
- From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
- Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 21:14:30 +0700
- Cc: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, mibs@ops.ietf.org, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, ipv6mib@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de, Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu>, Matt Mathis <mathis@psc.edu>, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, Steve Deering <deering@cisco.com>, Bob Hinden <hinden@iprg.nokia.com>
- In-reply-to: <3D9DD811.3000709@nc.rr.com>
- References: <3D9DD811.3000709@nc.rr.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20021004121241.02bbd5a0@mail.windriver.com> <3D92EE70.6658017A@cisco.com> <14590.1033751834@munnari.OZ.AU>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:04:01 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <bkhabs@nc.rr.com>
Message-ID: <3D9DD811.3000709@nc.rr.com>
| As long as the newer, better version supports IPv6.
Of course.
My expectation would be that any new mib, or for that matter, any
new anything (as much as it is relevant) now must support IPv6 to
be accepted.
kre