Re: FWD: Restart ifmib WG?

[Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>]

At 01:36 PM 10/2/2002 -0400, Thomas Narten wrote:
>I just sent the following message to the ifmib mailing list. Followups
>should take place there:
>
>     General Discussion:ifmib@ietf.org
>     To Subscribe:      http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ifmib
>     Archive:           ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ifmib
>
>Thomas
>------- Forwarded Message
>
>From: Thomas Narten <narten@cichlid.adsl.duke.edu>
>To: ifmib@ietf.org
>Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 13:34:14 -0400
>Subject: Restart ifmib WG?
>
>The ifmib WG still exists on paper, but hasn't been active for some
>time.
>
>There are still (IMO) some important work items that would be good to
>get done. For example:
>
> - advance IF-MIB to full std
> - advance inverted stack table mib to DS
>
>There might be some more possible items, but the above ones are
>critical in the sense that there are other documents that can't
>advance until the above takes place.
>
>Who here thinks the above are important to do? And just as important,
>are their folk here who would be willing to contribute cycles reviewing
>drafts, editing drafts, etc.?
>
>Are there other work items that should be considered?

bug fixes:

 - ifTableLastChange should be TimeStamp not TimeTicks
 - ifLastChange should be TimeStamp not TimeTicks
 - ifStackLastChange should be TimeStamp not TimeTicks

optional enhancements:

 - ifMtu needs a read-write version

the following objects may be available in a different MIB
for some media types:

 - ifSpeed needs a read-write version
 - ifHighSpeed needs a read-write version


>Thomas

Andy




>------- End of Forwarded Message