RE: [RMONMIB] MIB module numbering for TBD MIB roots

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

Andy,

What is the 'right' thing to do? Ask for a branch under experimental, or
define something like {rmon 6889}, or something else?

Thanks,

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Bierman [mailto:abierman@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:00 PM
> To: rmonmib@ietf.org
> Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: [RMONMIB] MIB module numbering for TBD MIB roots
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just noticed that the RAQMON MIB proposal to the RMONMIB WG
> is rooted at { mib-2 6889 }. This is a problem.
> 
> I think there should be a "well-known" MIB root assignment
> to indicate an unassigned MIB root.  (NOT under mib-2 !!)
> Something that will pass MIB compilers but other MIB development
> tools can flag as an error. At a minimum, dummy MIB roots must not
> be assigned in the same sub-tree as real MIB objects.
> 
> Andy
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RMONMIB mailing list
> RMONMIB@ietf.org
> http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmonmib
>