[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Objects in INDEX clause

To: chintan sheth <shethch@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Objects in INDEX clause
From: Wes Hardaker <wes@hardakers.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:58:07 -0800
Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20020103224207.3149.qmail@web14202.mail.yahoo.com> (chintansheth's message of "Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:42:07 -0800 (PST)")
Organization: Network Associates - NAI Labs
References: <20020103224207.3149.qmail@web14202.mail.yahoo.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service,i686-pc-linux)

>>>>> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:42:07 -0800 (PST), chintan sheth <shethch@yahoo.com> said:

chintan> Is it true that the objects in the INDEX clause can only be
chintan> columnar objects from same and/or another conceptual table,
chintan> but "MUST NOT BE SCALAR OBJECTS"?

This is true according to the current SMI model.  (There is no
technical reason it can't be done, however.  It may confuse people who
don't understand whether there should only be one value or whether
it's allowed to have multiple values, which is why it probably is
illegal).

-- 
Wes Hardaker
NAI Labs
Network Associates

References:
- Objects in INDEX clause
  - From: chintan sheth <shethch@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Objects in INDEX clause
Next by Date: Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Objects in INDEX clause
Next by thread: Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread