[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DEFVAL in an INDEX object

To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: RE: DEFVAL in an INDEX object
From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 09:53:01 -0800
Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <2413FED0DFE6D111B3F90008C7FA61FB0DFC3861@nl0006exch002u.nl.lucent.com>

HI,
Sorry for pushing this back. Mike MacFaden gave me the impression that
there was much controversy over the MIB, and, so I wanted to wait.

Resolving the rules for indexing, which is really the issue with the
MIB module, is important for the SNMP community.

I just got back from being 10 days away from the office, and there
are only two more weeks until IETF. So, lots of stuff to do.

Regards,
/david t. perkins

Prev by Date: Re: [libsmi] libsmi-0.3 announcement
Next by Date: Mib Module without DEFINITION::BEGIN statement
Prev by thread: Re: Mib Module without DEFINITION::BEGIN statement
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread