[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Non-member submission from [Randy Presuhn <rpresuhn@dorothy.bmc.com>]
- To: mibs@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Non-member submission from [Randy Presuhn <rpresuhn@dorothy.bmc.com>]
- From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:47:07 +0200
- Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:47:41 -0700
- Envelope-to: mibs-data@psg.com
Forwarding abounced posting
> ----------
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Randy Presuhn <rpresuhn@dorothy.bmc.com>
> To: mibs@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: MIB security boilerplate
>
> Hi -
>
> In the recent round of nit-picking on a sentence in the
> security considerations section for the update to RFC 1905,
> we realized that the language, which was cloned from
> http://www.ops.ietf.org/security.html, doesn't consider
> the security of notifications.
>
> The authentication, privacy, and access control aspects
> of notifications (for MIBs that define them) should all be
> included here.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Randy Presuhn BMC Software, Inc. 1-3141
> randy_presuhn@bmc.com 2141 North First Street
> Tel: +1 408 546-1006 San Jos> é, California 95131 USA
> ------------------------------------------------------
> My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
> ------------------------------------------------------
>