[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: InetAddressType and InetAddress in INET-ADDRESS-MIB



Frank... it is nice to see that we have a compiler that does check
rules as documented in RFCs. However, can you also tell us if
libsmi uses the rules for some usefull purpose?

Bert

> ----------
> From: 	Frank Strauss[SMTP:strauss@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de]
> Sent: 	Thursday, March 08, 2001 12:06 AM
> To: 	Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: 	mibs@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: 	Re: InetAddressType and InetAddress in INET-ADDRESS-MIB
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Bert> The current I-D draft-ietf-ops-rfc2851-update-00.txt contains this
> TC:
> 
> Bert> [...]                          In other words, the object
> identifiers
> Bert>             for the InetAddressType object and the InetAddress
> object
> Bert>             MUST have the same length and the last sub-identifier of
> Bert>             the InetAddressType object MUST be 1 less than the last
> Bert>             sub-identifier of the InetAddress object.
> 
> Bert> [...] So the question that I want to see answered is:
> 
> Bert> - How many tools/apps/code-generators do we know about that
> Bert>   indeed make use of this rule
> Bert> - How does this rule help any such tools
> Bert> - How important are those tools so that they justify this extra
> Bert>   MUST rule?
> 
> This does not answer your questions, however, it's related:
> Libsmi *checks* for this rule and warns about violations.
> An example (the only one I found from the current I-Ds) from
> draft-nadeau-mpls-vpn-mib-00.txt:
> 
> ./MPLS-VPN-MIB:398: `InetAddress' object should have an accompanied
> preceding `InetAdressType' object
> ./MPLS-VPN-MIB:406: `InetAddress' object should have an accompanied
> preceding `InetAdressType' object
> ./MPLS-VPN-MIB:416: `InetAddress' object should have an accompanied
> preceding `InetAdressType' object
> 
>  -frank
>