[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

MPLS-WG draft-nadeau-mpls-gmpls-te-mib-00.txt



NAME OF I-D:
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nadeau-mpls-gmpls-te-mib-00.txt

SUMMARY
   This memo defines an experimental portion of the Management
   Information Base  (MIB) for use with network management
   protocols in the Internet community.  In particular, it
   describes managed objects for extending the Multi-Protocol
   Label Switching (MPLS) [MPLSArch] Traffic Engineering
   Management Information Base in order to support Generalized
   MPLS [GMPLSARCH].
 
RELATED DOCUMENTS
Reference
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-many-gmpls-architecture-01.txt
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-04.txt
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-03.txt
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-03.txt
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-06.txt
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-mib-07.txt
Compete
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tewg-mib-00.txt
 
WHERE DOES IT FIT IN THE PICTURE OF THE SUB-IP WORK
CCAMP-WG or MPLS-WG
 
WHY IS IT TARGETED AT THIS WG
It should live with the GMPLS drafts. Currently these are in MPLS-WG but may move to CCAMP.
CCAMP-WG Charter has no work item that covers this MIB.
MPLS-WG Charter has...
4. Complete work on the MPLS-TE MIB.

JUSTIFICATION
GMPLS cannot proceed to RFC without control MIBs.
There appear to be no milestones for GMPLS!  I would expect the MIB to lag behind GMPLS by 3 to 6 months.
 
--
Adrian Farrel
Movaz Networks Inc.
afarrel@movaz.com