[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PPVPN draft-rosen-rfc2547bis-03.txt
- To: idsummary@subip.ietf.org
- Subject: PPVPN draft-rosen-rfc2547bis-03.txt
- From: Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 13:20:04 -0400
- Delivery-date: Thu, 03 May 2001 10:20:46 -0700
- Envelope-to: idsummary-data@psg.com
- Reply-to: erosen@cisco.com
- User-Agent: EMH/1.10.0 WEMI/1.13.2 (Mochimune) FLIM/1.12.1(Nishinokyō) Emacs/20.6 (sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1)MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN)
NAME OF I-D:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosen-rfc2547bis-03.txt
SUMMARY
This document specifies the "RFC2547" style of VPN that is called out as a
work item in the charter of the PPVPN WG. The primary goal of VPN
methodology is to support the case in which a client obtains IP backbone
services from a Service Provider or Service Providers with which it
maintains contractual relationships. The client may be an enterprise, a
group of enterprises which need an extranet, an Internet Service Provider,
an application service provider, another VPN Service Provider which uses
this same method to offer VPNs to clients of its own, etc.
In this VPN methodology, the interface which the service provider offers its
customer is a layer 3 interface. Different customers may have overlapping
address spaces. Each customer's address space is disambiguated, and BGP is
used to distribute the customer's routes across the backbone.
RELATED DOCUMENTS
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ppvpn-requirements-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ppvpn-framework-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosen-vpns-ospf-bgp-mpls-01.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosen-vpn-mcast-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-declercq-bgp-ipsec-vpn-01.txt
WHERE DOES IT FIT IN THE PICTURE OF THE SUB-IP WORK
This work fits squarely in the PPVPN box.
WHY IS IT TARGETED AT THIS WG
It addresses the following work item from the PPVPN WG charter:
The working group is expected to consider at least three
specific approaches, including BGP-VPNs (e.g. RFC 2547)
as it is the base spec for the RFC2547 VPNs.
JUSTIFICATION
The WG should consider this document as it specifically addresses one of the
work items called out in the charter.