[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[idn] Mozilla?

To: idn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: [idn] Mozilla?
From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 05:13:54 +0100
In-reply-to: <20050226081913.GD14956~@nicemice.net>
References: <D872CCF059514053ECF8A198@scan.jck.com> <421D8411.9030006@vanderpoel.org> <p06210208be4390618c81@[192.168.0.101]> <421E0D0C.2000309@vanderpoel.org> <p06210202be43c3888991@[192.168.0.101]> <E07CE813AD23B2D95DA0C740@scan.jck.com> <421E30F2.1040408@vanderpoel.org> <0E7F74C71945B923C52211F3@scan.jck.com> <421EA0C9.1010500@vanderpoel.org> <00a401c51af3$7863aae0$030aa8c0@DEWELL> <20050226081913.GD14956~@nicemice.net>

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/1754.html
Will people not associate IDN now with phishing.
In a way it seems worst than saying we block IDNs?
jfc

References:
- Re: [idn] nameprep2 and the slash homograph issue
  - From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
- [idn] punctuation
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: tedd <tedd@sperling.com>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: tedd <tedd@sperling.com>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
- [idn] process
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
- Re: [idn] process
  - From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell@adelphia.net>
- Re: [idn] process
  - From: "Adam M. Costello" <idn.amc+0@nicemice.net.RemoveThisWord>

Prev by Date: [idn] something a little lighter for the weekend
Next by Date: [idn] dichotomies
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] something a little lighter for the weekend
Next by thread: [idn] dichotomies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread