[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Re: process

To: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
Subject: Re: [idn] Re: process
From: James Seng <james@seng.cc>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:33:30 +0800
Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>
In-reply-to: <421F5CFA.5020903@vanderpoel.org>
References: <D872CCF059514053ECF8A198@scan.jck.com> <421D8411.9030006@vanderpoel.org> <p06210208be4390618c81@[192.168.0.101]> <421E0D0C.2000309@vanderpoel.org> <p06210202be43c3888991@[192.168.0.101]> <E07CE813AD23B2D95DA0C740@scan.jck.com> <421E30F2.1040408@vanderpoel.org> <0E7F74C71945B923C52211F3@scan.jck.com> <421EA0C9.1010500@vanderpoel.org> <00a401c51af3$7863aae0$030aa8c0@DEWELL> <20050225113725.GA8820@nic.fr> <421F482B.1060909@vanderpoel.org> <2b4b22d85b2872558414c64071e7b993@seng.cc> <421F5CFA.5020903@vanderpoel.org>

Erik,

That's a pretty cavalier attitude for someone who used to be co-chair of an IETF Working Group.

Please focus on my logic of my explanation instead of paying attention to who I am or who I was. Whats wrong with my explanation?

Maybe I should write an Informational RFC titled "IDN Considered Harmful". Would that catch your attention?

You should write what you think, and stop writing what will catch my (or others) attention. Perhaps that would be most constructive for all.

PS Re: RFC 3490 Security Considerations, please tell me exactly where punctuation is specifically mentioned.

I said it was discussed in the wg before. Lots of the discussion wasn't recorded into the RFC. Please go thru the archive and you find at least 2 threads discussing it. Its 2:32am for me now so I am heading to bed so sorry I cant post any URLs you right now.

-James Seng

References:
- Re: [idn] nameprep2 and the slash homograph issue
  - From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
- [idn] punctuation
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: tedd <tedd@sperling.com>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: tedd <tedd@sperling.com>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
- Re: [idn] punctuation
  - From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
- [idn] process
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
- Re: [idn] process
  - From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell@adelphia.net>
- [idn] Re: process
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: [idn] Re: process
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
- Re: [idn] Re: process
  - From: James Seng <james@seng.cc>
- Re: [idn] Re: process
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] process
Next by Date: Re: [idn] process
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] Re: process
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Re: process
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread