[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] upstream and downstream



Adam M. Costello wrote:
there's still the problem of characters that are supposed to use
different glyphs that are only slightly different and therefore easily
confusable.

I agree that some of the Unicode characters are only slightly different and therefore easily confusable.


But then, in the current climate, where phishing is becoming a larger problem and identity theft is growing fast, would you say that it is safe to use Unicode in *DNS*, one of the most important underpinnings, security-wise, of the Internet?

Let's take an analogy. The P.O. Box system. Right now, it uses numbers like P.O. Box 3256. What would happen if the Postal Service decided to use Unicode, where some of the characters are only slightly different, and the postman inadvertently put some important mail into the wrong box, one that was registered by an evil person, using a name that was only slightly different from the PO box of some company?

Wouldn't that company try to get the Postal Service to use a smaller set of symbols (say, digits) rather than this confusing Unicode? Maybe that company would even try to sue the Postal Service.

Erik