[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] homograph attacks

To: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
Subject: Re: [idn] homograph attacks
From: William Tan <wil@dready.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 02:28:06 +1100
Cc: "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, idn@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <4215D375.3080206@vanderpoel.org>
References: <FD16260E2EDF204E80A22FB904A425C30BD0A0CF@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4214ABF5.3080700@dready.org> <4214C445.9070106@vanderpoel.org> <6.0.0.20.2.20050218113553.08077390@localhost> <4215A572.3050903@v.loewis.de> <4215D375.3080206@vanderpoel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

Hi Erik,

Do you know whether any of the other gTLDs have adopted the Chinese blocking?

AFAIK, CNNIC and TWNIC are the only two that do Chinese bundling. But their activation policy differs from Verisign's.

Also, does any registry have blocking for any languages other than Chinese?

Check out the Persian IDN testbed project at IRNIC. They have a bundling policy. There may be other registries out there implementing bundling that I'm not aware of.

Regards,
wil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>

References:
- RE: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: "Michel Suignard" <michelsu@windows.microsoft.com>
- Re: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: William Tan <wil@dready.org>
- Re: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
- Re: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Re: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de>
- Re: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] homograph attacks
Next by Date: Re: [idn] IDN spoofing
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] homograph attacks
Next by thread: Re: [idn] homograph attacks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread