[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [idn] homograph attacks



John,
I replied privately to most of your points which are not related to my mail to Pat Kane. I want however to address one of your suggestion in here as it is of interest to everyone to understand what is the real situation.


At 18:17 16/02/2005, John C Klensin wrote:
While I think that an "International coordination list" would be
helpful, my assumption is that ICANN's idn-discuss list (see
http://www.icann.org/topics/idn.html for subscription
information and some other information that might be useful) is
intended to serve that purpose.

I suggest everyone to access the archives of that ICANN list dedicated to the IDNA deployment.
http://forum.icann.org/lists/idn-discuss/
1. one welcome
2. one broadcast
3. three phishing mails


 It is pretty clearly not this,
or any other, IETF list: the IETF made a series of fairly
explicit decisions to not get into the business of deciding what
things could or could not be registered within the very broad
coding mechanisms specified as part of IDNA.

This is why this list should probably be moved elsewhere when it starts discussing real issues.
jfc