Re: [idn] Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, andcomplete?

[Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>]

At 11:41 AM +0200 6/18/02, Dan Oscarsson wrote:
> They look identical because it is the same character.
That definition of "same" doesn't match the definition that the rest 
of us are using. They have different code points, they have different 
names, and they have different Unicode properties.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium