Re: [idn] Determining equivalence in Unicode DNS names

[liana Ye <liana.ydisg@juno.com>]

> So, this wg decided that we will use one and only one matching rule,
> just  like we decided to use only one character set. Both of these 
> (the rule and the charset) are created in the Unicode Consortium.

The decision of use one and only one matching rule is 
at false, because of there is no ONE rule can deal with 
hundreds of different scripts no matter how strong it 
appears that you defend the stand.  

The charset appears in the form of a table, which gives 
us a better view of these chars and we have a base 
to work with. But when you try to use only ONE rule to 
deal with all of the chars, the rule has to be bias for 
only one type of script, currently Latin.  If we let this 
pass from this IDN wg, then all of us here are arguing
for nothing, as the "Prohibit CDN code points" is the 
only way out suggested by Kenny Huang.   

Isn't the time for the WG to wake up from the "one rule 
for all" scope?

The only way out is to use multiple rules to treat multiple 
scripts, where each rule is identified by a tag. 

Liana