[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I want to revise RFC2784 (so it doesn't depend on IEEE number space)
- To: David Meyer <dmm@cisco.com>
- Subject: Re: I want to revise RFC2784 (so it doesn't depend on IEEE number space)
- From: Tony Li <tli@Procket.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: tli@Procket.com (Tony Li), gre@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:50:23 -0700
- Envelope-to: gre-data@psg.com
New protocols should go get an Ethertype.
Tony
David Meyer writes:
|
| I guess the objective is to make GRE a little more useful
| to new protocols. If that is not a sound objective, then
| it is likley that not useful to try something like I propose
| (for example, if there is a more appropriate/better encapsulation,
| etc).
|
| Dave
|
| According to Tony Li:
| >
| >
| >
| > If you do this, it's no longer GRE.
| >
| > Tony
| >
| >
| > David Meyer writes:
| > |
| > | Folks,
| > |
| > | I want to revise RFC 2784 so that GRE defines it's own
| > | number space (for payload protocol). We can keep 0x800
| > | for backward compatibility, but I want to lose the
| > | dependence on an IEEE number space.
| > |
| > | Comments?
| > |
| > | Dave
| > |
| > | [BTW, I don't see an existing IANA-administered number
| > | space that seems appropriate]
| > |
| > |
| >
| >