[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I want to revise RFC2784 (so it doesn't depend on IEEE number space)
- To: tli@Procket.com (Tony Li)
- Subject: Re: I want to revise RFC2784 (so it doesn't depend on IEEE number space)
- From: David Meyer <dmm@cisco.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: dmm@cisco.com (David Meyer), gre@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:43:27 -0700
- Envelope-to: gre-data@psg.com
I guess the objective is to make GRE a little more useful
to new protocols. If that is not a sound objective, then
it is likley that not useful to try something like I propose
(for example, if there is a more appropriate/better encapsulation,
etc).
Dave
According to Tony Li:
>
>
>
> If you do this, it's no longer GRE.
>
> Tony
>
>
> David Meyer writes:
> |
> | Folks,
> |
> | I want to revise RFC 2784 so that GRE defines it's own
> | number space (for payload protocol). We can keep 0x800
> | for backward compatibility, but I want to lose the
> | dependence on an IEEE number space.
> |
> | Comments?
> |
> | Dave
> |
> | [BTW, I don't see an existing IANA-administered number
> | space that seems appropriate]
> |
> |
>
>