[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: is there any group interest in my MIB proposal?

To: bryan_levin@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: is there any group interest in my MIB proposal?
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:25:15 +0100
Cc: eos@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20030227164153.71784.qmail@web13310.mail.yahoo.com>(bryan_levin@yahoo.com)
References: <20030227164153.71784.qmail@web13310.mail.yahoo.com>

>>>>> B Levin writes:

B> I admit the hybrid snmp-based snapshot & file-transfer approach is
B> not a purist solution; but sometimes getting the job done quickly,
B> efficiently and with minimal disruption to existing systems can
B> justify non-traditional approaches.

This is the old story about short-term vs. long-term benefits and it
reminds me of the NAT vs. IPv6 thing. Let us just agree to disagree
since it is unlikely that we change our positions.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder    <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>

References:
- Re: is there any group interest in my MIB proposal?
  - From: "B. Levin" <bryan_levin@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: the future of SNMP
Next by Date: RE: the future of SNMP
Previous by thread: Re: is there any group interest in my MIB proposal?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread