Re: the future of SNMP

["Carl W. Kalbfleisch" <ckalbfleisch@verio.net>]

I believe that there is some need to do some additional protocol work to
handle selective get/walk and configuration.

Carl

Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:30:25 -0700, Bruce Shaw <Bruce.Shaw@gov.ab.ca> said:
> > > > > >           
> > > > >         
> > > >       
> > >     
> >   
>
> Bruce> Yes.  My primary concern was that I don't want SNMP to fall by
> Bruce> the wayside - some of us still want to use it.
>
> I think Bert's more specific question was: do you want to see further
> development in the protocol itself, or just in the MIBs that are
> transferred over the protocol.