[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Call for censensus on path forward

To: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: Call for censensus on path forward
From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:57:34 -0700
Cc: "Glenn Waters" <gww@nortelnetworks.com>, eos@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <sdvg5033ak.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net>
References: <5.1.1.6.2.20020920112447.0427b120@127.0.0.1><5.1.1.6.2.20020920112447.0427b120@127.0.0.1>

HI,

Well, reading between the lines and making a few assumptions...
1) Wes and I both agree that any proposal MUST work with the
   existing SMI
2) Wes and I both agree that any proposal MUST have little
   and possibly no impact to existing access routines to
   management information.
3) Wes and I both agree that changes (which may be large) to
   agent and management code that encodes and decodes SNMP
   PDUs are acceptable and are expected. (That is, little
   gained by keeping PDU formats the same.)

Regards,
/david t. perkins

References:
- RE: Call for censensus on path forward
  - From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Call for censensus on path forward
Next by Date: RE: Call for censensus on path forward
Previous by thread: RE: Call for censensus on path forward
Next by thread: RE: Call for censensus on path forward
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread