[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Protocol operations proposal deadline

To: "Harrington, David" <dbh@enterasys.com>
Subject: Re: Protocol operations proposal deadline
From: Wes Hardaker <wes@hardakers.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:16:07 -0700
Cc: eos@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <6D745637A7E0F94DA070743C55CDA9BA0757E6@NHROCMBX1.ets.enterasys.com> ("Harrington,David"'s message of "Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:07:59 -0400")
Organization: Network Associates - NAI Labs
References: <6D745637A7E0F94DA070743C55CDA9BA0757E6@NHROCMBX1.ets.enterasys.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo,i686-pc-linux)

>>>>> On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:07:59 -0400, "Harrington, David" <dbh@enterasys.com> said:

David> I think we should keep the RFC2571 architectural principles in
David> mind when reviewing these proposals.

I suspect that what I've done in my latest draft, at least, should
agree with your goals.  Let me know if you find otherwise.

-- 
"The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will
 insist on coming along and trying to put things in it."   -- Terry Pratchett

References:
- RE: Protocol operations proposal deadline
  - From: "Harrington, David" <dbh@enterasys.com>

Prev by Date: Call for censensus on path forward
Next by Date: Re: Call for censensus on path forward
Previous by thread: RE: Protocol operations proposal deadline
Next by thread: comments on draft-shield-eos-capabilities-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread