Re: Proposal cutoff deadline September 15

[Glenn Mansfield Keeni <glenn@cysols.com>]

Though Time-based aggregation (www.ietf.org/draft-glenn-mo-taggr-mib-00.txt)
is bundled together with the MO aggregation proposal, it is a separate issue
altogether.
We need a MIB for sampling an MO instance at very small intervals (millisecs ?)
AND hauling the values across the network using the good old simple "snmp-get"
for an online, near-realtime display of the MO instances time-development at
very high time-resolution { packets, octets, errors etc. at millisec intervals}.

Glenn M Keeni


Glenn Waters wrote:
> Not that a reminder is necessary, but proposals are due by Monday.
> 
> The three proposals currently on the table are:
> 
> 1. Dave Shield's Extended Capability Negotiation
>    www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shield-eos-capabilities-00.txt
> 
> 2. Wes Hardaker's Object Oriented PDUs for SNMP
>    www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hardaker-eos-oops-00.txt
>    (soon to be -01)
> 
> 3. Glenn Mansfield Keeni's Managed Object / Aggregation MIB modules
>    www.ietf.org/draft-glenn-mo-aggr-mib-01.txt
>    www.ietf.org/draft-glenn-mo-taggr-mib-00.txt
> 
> The WG needs to come to consensus on path forward from here.
> 
> I propose that we select one of the three solutions listed above as the 
> one solution that the WG will focus on for development.
> 
> The question that I plan on asking on Monday is:
> 
> Which of proposals 1, 2, or 3 do you think that the WG should pursue to 
> focus in on the work items in the charter?
> 
> Is there any discussion around the question?
>