RE: About time SNMP changed :D

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

You may want to take a look at the OPS-NM work that is
going on. It also expresses that requirement.
Discussion on ops-nm@ops.ietf.org

Document:
 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ops-operator-req-mgmt-01.txt
 (missed the submission cutoff, see
     http://www.pch.net/documents/papers/internet-drafts/draft-ops-operator-req-mgmt/draft-ops-operator-req-mgmt-01
 instead).


Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjay Debnath [mailto:ironluca@mail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:33 AM
> To: eos@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: About time SNMP changed :D
> 
> 
> It is quite perhaps a much haggaled over subject - however, 
> the fact still remains that SNMP in it's entirety is much to 
> complicated to be effectively implemented.
> 
> Did anybody think about a text based protocol :D
> 
> Ironluca
> 
> Ironluca@mail.com
> -- 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
> http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
> 
> 
> 1 cent a minute calls anywhere in the U.S.!
> 
> http://www.getpennytalk.com/cgi-bin/adforward.cgi?p_key=RG9853
> KJ&url=http://www.getpennytalk.com
> 
> 
>