Re: Open/Closed Issues on SNMP Extended Protocol MIB

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>]

>>>>> Sharon Chisholm writes:

Sharon> 3. We will require support of protocol operations as defined
Sharon> in RFC1905.

So even if I have a new MIB which takes advantage of row operations, I
still have to implement good old arbitrary atomic sets semantics
without an escape mechanism such as "too complex" in order to be
compliant? So where is the win?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder      Technical University Braunschweig
<schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>  Dept. Operating Systems & Computer Networks
Phone: +49 531 391 3289    Bueltenweg 74/75, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Fax:   +49 531 391 5936    <URL:http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/~schoenw/>