[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft-ietf-eos-snmp-rowops-00.txt
- To: Lauren Heintz <lheintz@cisco.com>
- Subject: Re: draft-ietf-eos-snmp-rowops-00.txt
- From: Robert Story <rstory@freesnmp.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 11:52:46 -0400
- Cc: eos@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Wed, 02 May 2001 08:56:43 -0700
- Envelope-to: eos-data@psg.com
At 8:38 AM -0700 5/2/01, Lauren Heintz wrote:
>Also, since the inheritance value for instanceParts would thus
>be "NULL", I'm wondering if the inheritance OID for tableParts
>should be the NULL OID (0.0) instead of 1.0? I think I have
>this as an issue in the appendix. I think 0.0 works just as
>well as 1.0 AND may be more intuitive? Any opinions?
>
I agree. It would make sense then, to use NULL OID for both cases, instead
of one being an OID type and one being NULL type.