Re: EOS Row Operations (and other documents)

["Joel M. Halpern" <joel@longsys.com>]

I listened to the discussion at the working group, and then read Lauren's 
description, and I am confused.  What is the behavior / need / ... that 
this work item is addressing that is not addressed just by people using 
creatAndGo?
Yours,
Joel M. Halpern

At 08:08 AM 3/24/01 -0800, Lauren Heintz wrote:
>    - A new RowStatusLite TC (actual name yet to be determined)
>      This TC will represent an evolvement from the current
>      RowStatus TC.  RSLite will not include a createAndWait status,
>      and will require implmentations to support other extended features
>      such as the SetRow PDU.  I personally wonder if the row timeout
>      requirement for NotInService states is still required, because I
>      believe that overly complicates configuration chores (I think NIS
>      should be a valid, persistent conceptual config state).