Hi,
I feel if even only 2or 3 of us are interested we should carry on.
Some of us may not be in a postion to actively contribute but we could well observe and comment.
Rgds
jayasurya
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Day [mailto:markday@cisco.com]
Sent: Wed 3/19/2003 3:01 AM
To: michael.speer@sun.com; cdn@ops.ietf.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: Is CDI dead?
We do still have a couple of drafts (scenarios and known-mechanisms) that
could conceivably make it to RFC. But other than that, I would say that the
group is pretty inert and that the people who responded to my last query
overwhelmingly said that the WG should be wound down.
--Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> Michael Speer
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:14 PM
> To: cdn@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Is CDI dead?
>
>
> > All,
> >
> > Is CDI dead? No activity and no interest leads me to believe the
> > group is dead. Mark
> > do you have any comments?
> >
> > Michael
>
>
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Day [mailto:markday@cisco.com]
Sent: Wed 3/19/2003 3:01 AM
To: michael.speer@sun.com; cdn@ops.ietf.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: Is CDI dead?
We do still have a couple of drafts (scenarios and known-mechanisms) that
could conceivably make it to RFC. But other than that, I would say that the
group is pretty inert and that the people who responded to my last query
overwhelmingly said that the WG should be wound down.
--Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> Michael Speer
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:14 PM
> To: cdn@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Is CDI dead?
>
>
> > All,
> >
> > Is CDI dead? No activity and no interest leads me to believe the
> > group is dead. Mark
> > do you have any comments?
> >
> > Michael
>
>
>