Re: Architecture draft coming

["Phil Rzewski" <philr@inktomi.com>]

We definitely made a conscious decision to phase out the word "peering" in
favor of the less controversial "internetworking". So in all your examples
below, we would definitely favor the "internetworking" case over the
"peering" case.

--
Phil


At 11:18 PM 6/29/2002 -0700, Michael Speer wrote:
>[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to
>  miss and therefore delete mis-posts.  so fix subscription addresses! ]
>
>And more generally, for all the drafts, should we be using the term 
>PEERING SYSTEM or INTERNETWORKING SYSTEM?
>The new AAA draft calls the accounting system the ACCOUNTING PEERING 
>SYSTEM.  The models
>draft calls it the ACCOUNTING INTERNETWORKING SYSTEM.
>
>Thanks,
>Michael
>
>
>michael.speer@sun.com wrote:
>
>>[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to
>>  miss and therefore delete mis-posts.  so fix subscription addresses! ]
>>
>>The architecture draft is coming.  But, I wanted resolve a few questions.
So,
>>here goes.  
>>
>>1. In the latest model draft the terms: Distribution Peering System,
>>Accounting Peering
>>   System, and Request Routing Peering System have been eliminated.  The
>>current
>>   architecture draft makes use of these terms.  So, my question, should I
>>drop the
>>   use of the word peering and just use terms like Distribution System?
Or,
>>do in
>>   appropriate places inset the use of the work internetworking?  Some
>>guidance would
>>   be appreciated.
>>
>>2. Next, I assume that I am correct that a content peering gateway is now
the
>>content
>>   internetworking gateway.  This is correct yes?
>>
>>3. Is there an update to the distribution requirements document? Some of the
>>distriubtion
>>   methods are not defined yet.  This has impact on the distrbution part
of the
>>   architecture.  The draft I am reading is distribution-reqs-00.txt.
>>
>>
>>I hope to have draft done by deadline Monday.  If not, I will e-mail it to
>>group before the IETF.  Is there a meeting on Yokohama?  Or, are we waiting
>>till the Atlanta meeting to meet again?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
--
Phil Rzewski - Senior Architect - Inktomi Corporation                  
650-653-2487 (office) - 650-303-3790 (cell) - 650-653-1848 (fax)