Re: WCIP/Content-signaling

[Mike Dahlin <dahlin@cs.utexas.edu>]

Abbie Barbir wrote:

> can somebody post the addresses of the revelant lists.
>

My original message bounced for the cdn mailing list (but made it to the
others). Sorry about the confusion to people on the cdn list but not the others.

The web page is
    http://www.content-signaling.org

The mailing list is content-signaling@lists.cc.utexas.edu
To subscribe, send the message
  To: listproc@lists.cc.utexas.edu
then, in the BODY
  SUBSCRIBE content-signaling FIRSTNAME LASTNAME

-mike



> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fred Douglis" <douglis@research.att.com>
> To: "Ian Cooper" <icooper@equinix.com>
> Cc: "Mike Dahlin" <dahlin@cs.utexas.edu>; <cdn@ops.ietf.org>;
> <webi@lists.equinix.com>; <wrec@cs.utk.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 4:20 PM
> Subject: Re: WCIP/Content-signaling
>
> > It's not a "splinter group" per se.  The point is that the people
> interested
> > in this topic (a dozen or so in all) met after the WG/BOF meetings to
> discuss
> > further, and felt that sending all the mail to both CDN and WEBI on this
> > particular topic might overwhelm the many more people with much less
> interest.
> > So a separate mailing list was created, just like under CDN there are
> > additional lists for the strawman internet drafts, early adopters, and so
> on.  T
> > This doesn't mean things won't go to the other lists when appropriate,
> just
> > that the lower-level discussions need not involve so many lists.
> >
> > The next question is how WCIP relates to RUP, which is maybe what you were
> > really asking.  I'll let one of the WCIP authors answer that.
> >
> > I'm responding to the full lists in the hopes that this satisfies and
> closes
> > the issue, but I know we risk a big email discussion of this.  Since WCIP
> was
> > previously discussed in the context of WREC, I propose that follow-ups go
> just
> > to WREC (webi not being established enough yet).
> >
> > Fred
> >
> >