RE: What is CONTENT?

[Gary Tomlinson <garyt@entera.com>]

We (the design team) have come to the conclusion its the best term at this
point in time for us to use in the current IDs.  I suspect there will be
much more disucssion going forward, since this is an area in which there are
many opions and perspectives.  I can imagine having sub groups (assuming a
WG forms) that drill down into the three core elements and distill things
much better.

Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Hofmann [mailto:hofmann@bell-labs.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 10:37 AM
To: Gary Tomlinson
Cc: Barron Housel; Hilarie Orman; cdn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: What is CONTENT?


Gary Tomlinson wrote:

> Yes, request mapping (formerly direction) systems need to parse headers in
> the content-aware case.

So, is the "official" name now "request mapping"? Has there been a
common agreement among the group to adapt this name? I had some
objections (see previous mail)...

-Markus