Content [Distribution Network] Peering (was Re: Candidate re-charter/new WG)

[Fred Douglis <douglis@research.att.com>]

Phil,

You make a good point: "CDN Peering" may be too specific to cover the scenario 
you've described, unless one is generous with the definition of a CDN.

However, I think "Content Peering" is a poor term, because we're not peering 
"content", we're peering entities that deliver content.  (This is similar to 
the forwarding-versus-routing debate that has hit the cdn mailing list today). 

I'm not sure I have a third suggestion that I like more than these two, just 
that I think "Content Peering" is the wrong direction to take this.  For now I 
would be inclined to include your scenario under the CDN framework.

Fred