Re: CCAMP drafts for adoption

["Francesco Fondelli" <francesco.fondelli@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net> wrote:
>
>
>> > draft-takacs-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-01.txt
>> > draft-takacs-ccamp-rsvp-te-eth-oam-ext-03.txt
>
> Do not support either of these.

Given this statement

a)
--- draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-00 ---
The MPLS-TP control plane is based on a combination of
the MPLS control plane for pseudowires and the GMPLS
control plane for MPLS-TP LSPs, respectively.  More
specifically, LDP is used for PW signaling and
*GMPLS based RSVP-TE for LSP signaling*.
---

and this requirement

b)
--- draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements-00 --
The MPLS-TP control pane MUST support the configuration
and modification of OAM maintenance points as well as
the activation/deactivation of OAM *when the transport
path is established or modified*.
---

RSVP-TE is the tool that has to be used for OAM
configuration in a MPLS-TP context, IMHO.

Above I-Ds are mpls working group documents... so
my opinion on the adoption of the following two drafts

draft-takacs-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-01.txt
draft-takacs-ccamp-rsvp-te-eth-oam-ext-03.txt

is yes

and my opinion on the adoption of the following draft

draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-encode-01.txt

is yes

> Thanks
> Nitin

thanks
Ciao
FF